“Pride and Prejudice and Zombies”: It’s “Pride and Prejudice” … with zombies. The “Pride and Prejudice” parts work fine. It’s the zombie bits that are a problem. My RogerEbert.com review.
Zombies? No. Not ever for me. Decaying flesh, smell and appearance, belies sexy. I’m all about various versions of Austen classics. The original novel reads well but to see her characters brought to life adds a wonderful dimension to the tale. Rotting flesh isn’t one of them.
Now I might be interested in Sense and Sensibilities with Sea Monsters. We’ll see, cause as you say, Christy, it’s sure to become a film.
“Pride and Prejudice and Zombies”: It’s “Pride and Prejudice” … with zombies. The “Pride and Prejudice” parts work fine. It’s the zombie bits that are a problem. My RogerEbert.com review.
Zombies? No. Not ever for me. Decaying flesh, smell and appearance, belies sexy. I’m all about various versions of Austen classics. The original novel reads well but to see her characters brought to life adds a wonderful dimension to the tale. Rotting flesh isn’t one of them.
Now I might be interested in Sense and Sensibilities with Sea Monsters. We’ll see, cause as you say, Christy, it’s sure to become a film.